Archives For church

C.P.A.C.

August 17, 2009 — Leave a comment
146353219_172777c489<image courtesy of billy verdin>

Beginning Tuesday, Sarah and I will be attending the Church Planter Assessment Center as part of a potential ‘next step’  (a special thanks Western PA District of The Wesleyan Church, who is investing the cost of attending CPAC in Sarah and me); we’ll be there with two other couples, including Rick and Eunice Cox, who are also from the WPA District.   If time and energy allow, I’ll be posting reflections of the day’s activities each evening (be warned, it may be nonsensical gobbeldy-gook or nothing more than a terse sentence); hopefully, if you’re thinking of being assessed, it will help answer some of the questions you may have.  It will also be a good read (I’m hoping!) for those of you who are curious about the planting and pre-planting processes we use.

In the meantime, it might be helpful to know what the Assessment is all about.  Here’s how the Assessment Center describes itself:

We are confident that this will be a powerful and highly worthwhile personal experience that will provide you with greater self-awareness about your ministry strengths and gifts, as well as your potential for church planting success. You and your sponsoring district or parent church will receive an objective, team-based evaluation to help you both make the wisest possible decisions about your church planting leadership.

In other words, the people of the Center look at the likely success of an individual or couple as the ‘lead planter(s)’ in a new church.  The result of a fairly intense, multi-day process is an evaluation focused simply on the likely success of the potential planter articulated as a “Green Light,” “Yellow Light” or “Red Light.”

Red Light… is an indicator that the potential planter is not likely to find themselves effective in a planting environment right now.

Yellow Light… indicates the potential planter is more likely to find success in a planting environment if certain growth areas are given due attention.

Green Light… indicates that the evaluators feel the planter is likely to find success/effectiveness in their endeavors.

It’s important to note, again, this relates just to church planting  and isn’t a judgment on people, personalities or ministry calling; it is meant to help potential church planters and the districts, churches, and individuals which invest in new churches to thrive.  A ‘Red Light’ shouldn’t be seen as a bad thing, but more as an aid in discerning whether or not planting is the right ministry path for someone right now.  A ‘Green Light’ doesn’t mean one person/couple is ‘better’ than another, but that they seem to have the gifts and personal traits that tend to be found in effective church planters.  A ‘Green Light’ isn’t a guarantee of ‘success’, either.

This all helps to make sure that someone isn’t setting themselves up for failure, and that they are designed for/capable of handling the unique stresses, pressures, and situations that are involved in attempting to launch a new, Kingdom advancing church.  From the outside, it looks like a great opportunity for someone with potential to be a planter to find out if planting really is the right step for them.

If YOU feel like God might be leading you into the direction of planting a church, you should connect with Shawn Cossin and surf on over to Uought2.org.  And, maybe one day, we’ll see YOU at assessment!


This entry also posted at theydidwewill.blogspot.com, the blog of the Church Multiplication Task Force of the WPA District of the Wesleyan Church.

Mall Fail

August 3, 2009 — 1 Comment

Image: violator3Image: violator3

A few days ago I posted ‘That’s okay…’ about some positive learning experiences I had with some friends at the mall last week.

Let me share a few things that were ‘teachable moments’ because of what they teach us to avoid.  Don’t worry, names have been changed to protect the innocent and avoid some kind of libel charge:

Understanding your environment is incredibly important:

I haven’t been able to find Bottle Caps anywhere.  You know: those sweet-tart kind of candies that have a little fizz in them?  We can’t get them where I live, so while we were at the mall, the four of us dropped into Childhood Obesity R Us (a candy shack).  But right next to the candy shack (which, by the way, did have Bottle Caps… at an incredible premium) was Carcinogen Crossing (a tobacco shop).  That may not have been a problem… except that the smell of the tobacco shop was incredibly overwhelming… it morphed with the sweets smell of the candy shack and created some kind of nasty, hanging malodorous funk that wasn’t at all pleasant.  The candy shack wasn’t doing very much business, and I can’t help but wonder if it had something to do with its neighbor.   Who are the candy people trying to reach?  Tobacco smokers?  Or would vying for a spot near the Lego store have been a better bet?

What does that have to do with churchy stuff?  Oftentimes it’s tempting to do something that worked very well elsewhere… in some other environment.  But ‘plugging’ that program/idea/method into where we live just won’t be effective because of where we’re situated. We’re trying to reach lego-store kind of people next to a tobacco shop… maybe we should try to do something to meet the needs of the people around us in their own context.

A few months ago, a friend of mine posted this link–it’s a good example of the need to understand your environment in a ministry setting.

Know your environment.

Simplify:

There was a certain item we were hoping to get.  An item so in demand many people want one, but not so currently ‘have to have it’ that anyone should be sold out.  Checking was done about which stores should have this item in stock.  One didn’t.  Another of the same chain didn’t.  A third store did, but was unable to provide the right kind of service… so a purchase was made to get the item all the others were supposed to have and a walk commenced to one of those other stores to get the rest of the process taken care of. (I’m being purposefully ambiguous, sorry for how awkward that paragraph was).

It was a lot of work and frustration for something pretty easy—especially when you understand the money was going to be spent on this item… and it was going to bolster the sales of one store or another.  If people would have just done what they said they would, a very happy customer would have been had.  Instead, they were left with a customer who wasn’t so much ‘happy’ as ‘finally taken care of’.

I wonder what we do that could use some simplifying; what we do that is overly frustrating and inconvenient for a reason that made sense on paper or in theory but has no practical benefit…

Just Be Who You Are:

One of the stores we stepped into was kind of like the Apple Store’s socially awkward distant cousin.  In fact, it was meant to compete with an ‘Apple Store’ kind of draw.  But something happened: the culture of the parent company and the culture of this particular store didn’t match.  Somehow in the push to ‘be like the other guys’ this brand, in my own uneducated opinion, was suffering.  The people were only focused on selling a product, not representing company, brand, or offering experience.

There’s nothing wrong with competing.  There’s not anything wrong with seeing how your competition is doing something and besting them at it.  But trouble comes when we sacrifice who we are in order to compete with some other ‘growing concern.’  It’s very doubtful the ‘growing concern’ grew by laying identity on the altar of success.

So, who wants to go to the mall with me this weekend?